ABOUT TECHNOLOGY.
(Electric car)
Home Opinion: Pros & Cons Robert Bryce: Another Electric-Car Fiasco Looms
Robert Bryce: Another Electric-Car Fiasco Looms
Monday, 16 April 2012 16:09 Robert Bryce, National Review Online
Get ready for the next Solyndra. Sure, you’ve heard those words before. Over the past few months, several companies that had federal backing — Beacon Power, Range Fuels, and Ener1 — all failed. And another one is almost surely on the way. Here’s my prediction: Within 18 months, A123 Systems, the battery maker that got a $249 million grant from the Department of Energy, will be bankrupt.
My prediction doesn’t have anything to do with the explosion that occurred on Wednesday at a GM laboratory near Detroit, sending one worker to the hospital. The explosion occurred while the worker was testing a battery made by A123. That news came on the heels of the announcement last month that A123 would have to spend $55 million to replace defective battery packs it sold to Fisker Automotive, the car company that is using a U.S. government loan to make high-performance $100,000 vehicles in Finland. But predicting A123’s failure doesn’t depend on the latest news, or require any special analytical skills or inside market knowledge. It requires only a quick look at the company’s financials.
More on that in a moment. First, though, the broader and more essential point to be made — yet again — is that the Obama administration made a huge mistake in backing the electric-vehicle industry. The administration has handed out $2.4 billion in grants to the electric-vehicle sector, as well as nearly $2.6 billion in loans. And it did so despite the EV sector’s dismal history, which is a century of failure tailgating failure.
The failure can be seen by looking at sales. Even though gasoline prices are painfully high, consumers are staying away from electric cars in droves. During the first quarter, Nissan sold just 1,800 copies of its much-ballyhooed all-electric Leaf. And yet the automaker continues to insist that it will sell 20,000 Leafs in the U.S. this year. Meanwhile, sales of another overhyped “green” car, the Chevy Volt hybrid, have been so disappointing that GM has had to idle production at its Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant twice this year.
Compare the sales of the Volt (2,289 vehicles sold in March) with those of more traditional vehicles. In March alone, Toyota sold 27,711 Priuses, and the Japanese automaker expects sales of the popular hybrid-electric car to remain strong. Meanwhile, March sales of the venerable Toyota Corolla — which gets about 34 miles per gallon on the highway, nearly the same as the Volt — totaled 28,289. Oh, and the sticker price on the Corolla — about $16,000 — is less than half that of the Volt, which sells for about $40,000.
The problems for producers of all-electric cars haven’t changed in a century: The vehicles don’t have enough range, they take too long to recharge, and they cost way too much. That final point was reinforced last year in a report issued by Deloitte Consulting, which found that the most likely buyers of electric cars are people with household incomes “in excess of $200,000.”
Alas, the facts about electric cars didn’t stop investors from showing irrational exuberance over A123. In September 2009, the company held an initial public offering and sold shares for $13.50. Enthusiasm was so great that the stock soared by 50 percent on the first day of trading. A few weeks later, the stock reached its all-time high: $25.00.
But then reality started to set in and the stock began a long, steady fizzle. In 2009, the company lost $85.7 million. In 2010, it lost another $152.5 million. Last month, when the company released its 2011 financials, it tried to put a positive spin on the results, pointing out that revenues had increased by 64 percent to $159 million. But it couldn’t obscure the bad news: Losses had increased even faster — by 69 percent to $257.7 million. At the end of 2011, the company’s long-term debt was $146 million while cash on hand totaled $186 million.
To be clear, A123 hasn’t failed yet. But the class-action lawyers are smelling blood. Since the beginning of the month, six firms have filed lawsuits claiming A123 has committed securities fraud.
On Friday, A123’s stock was selling for $0.92 per share. Look out below.
— Robert Bryce, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, is the author, most recently, of Power Hungry: The Myths of “Green” Energy and the Real Fuels of the Future.
Home Opinion: Pros & Cons Robert Bryce: Another Electric-Car Fiasco Looms
Robert Bryce: Another Electric-Car Fiasco Looms
Monday, 16 April 2012 16:09 Robert Bryce, National Review Online
Get ready for the next Solyndra. Sure, you’ve heard those words before. Over the past few months, several companies that had federal backing — Beacon Power, Range Fuels, and Ener1 — all failed. And another one is almost surely on the way. Here’s my prediction: Within 18 months, A123 Systems, the battery maker that got a $249 million grant from the Department of Energy, will be bankrupt.
My prediction doesn’t have anything to do with the explosion that occurred on Wednesday at a GM laboratory near Detroit, sending one worker to the hospital. The explosion occurred while the worker was testing a battery made by A123. That news came on the heels of the announcement last month that A123 would have to spend $55 million to replace defective battery packs it sold to Fisker Automotive, the car company that is using a U.S. government loan to make high-performance $100,000 vehicles in Finland. But predicting A123’s failure doesn’t depend on the latest news, or require any special analytical skills or inside market knowledge. It requires only a quick look at the company’s financials.
More on that in a moment. First, though, the broader and more essential point to be made — yet again — is that the Obama administration made a huge mistake in backing the electric-vehicle industry. The administration has handed out $2.4 billion in grants to the electric-vehicle sector, as well as nearly $2.6 billion in loans. And it did so despite the EV sector’s dismal history, which is a century of failure tailgating failure.
The failure can be seen by looking at sales. Even though gasoline prices are painfully high, consumers are staying away from electric cars in droves. During the first quarter, Nissan sold just 1,800 copies of its much-ballyhooed all-electric Leaf. And yet the automaker continues to insist that it will sell 20,000 Leafs in the U.S. this year. Meanwhile, sales of another overhyped “green” car, the Chevy Volt hybrid, have been so disappointing that GM has had to idle production at its Detroit-Hamtramck assembly plant twice this year.
Compare the sales of the Volt (2,289 vehicles sold in March) with those of more traditional vehicles. In March alone, Toyota sold 27,711 Priuses, and the Japanese automaker expects sales of the popular hybrid-electric car to remain strong. Meanwhile, March sales of the venerable Toyota Corolla — which gets about 34 miles per gallon on the highway, nearly the same as the Volt — totaled 28,289. Oh, and the sticker price on the Corolla — about $16,000 — is less than half that of the Volt, which sells for about $40,000.
The problems for producers of all-electric cars haven’t changed in a century: The vehicles don’t have enough range, they take too long to recharge, and they cost way too much. That final point was reinforced last year in a report issued by Deloitte Consulting, which found that the most likely buyers of electric cars are people with household incomes “in excess of $200,000.”
Alas, the facts about electric cars didn’t stop investors from showing irrational exuberance over A123. In September 2009, the company held an initial public offering and sold shares for $13.50. Enthusiasm was so great that the stock soared by 50 percent on the first day of trading. A few weeks later, the stock reached its all-time high: $25.00.
But then reality started to set in and the stock began a long, steady fizzle. In 2009, the company lost $85.7 million. In 2010, it lost another $152.5 million. Last month, when the company released its 2011 financials, it tried to put a positive spin on the results, pointing out that revenues had increased by 64 percent to $159 million. But it couldn’t obscure the bad news: Losses had increased even faster — by 69 percent to $257.7 million. At the end of 2011, the company’s long-term debt was $146 million while cash on hand totaled $186 million.
To be clear, A123 hasn’t failed yet. But the class-action lawyers are smelling blood. Since the beginning of the month, six firms have filed lawsuits claiming A123 has committed securities fraud.
On Friday, A123’s stock was selling for $0.92 per share. Look out below.
— Robert Bryce, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, is the author, most recently, of Power Hungry: The Myths of “Green” Energy and the Real Fuels of the Future.
Tesla Radiant Energy Kit Under Development
Lawrence Rayburn claims to have successfully replicated Tesla's radiant energy technology, and to now be in process of creating a kit. Spurs firestorm of discussion. [A synopsis would be much appreciated!]
The Message That Started it All (this recent activity):
(before he actually reported success)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/message/5059
From: "[Lawrence] Rayburn" <srayburn@mo.quik.com>
Date: Sat Nov 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: Here is the FE, I need help to connect! Radiant Energy
There is a way to have your cake and eat it too!
Go back to Tesla's original experiments with tapping the electrosphere of the Earth with the radiant energy collector.
Tesla discovered a 'cold electricity' that he said had a spiral transmission wave to it.
In his patent, Tesla said he mounted a plate of steel or brass on a flag pole and placed a brass plate in the ground. In between the two, he placed a tuned tank circuit set to resonate near the standing wave frequency of the Earth. He parallelled the tunable tank circuit to a spark gap with carbon electrodes. The conductors he used would limit the amount of current he could pass and an air core transformer fed by the spark gap (pulsed DC) allowed him to derive pulsed AC or DC from the setup at whatever voltage he chose. Remember, the size of the conductors in the transformer and spark gap, and between the antenna and the spark gap determine the amount of current that can pass.
Updated to today, the antenna needs to be a flat spiral wound to resonate at the resonant frequency of the energy to be transferred from the electrosphere to the the ground through the spark gap. The tank circuit in parallel allows you to tune the circuit to pass current. The closer to the standing wave resonant frequency the tank circuit comes, the more current is passed to the spark gap and on to ground.
I am experimenting with flat spiral wound antennas made of copper tubing, 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 inch diameters so far, but may have to go as high as 2 inches in diameter. I started with 50 foot rolls of copper tubing, and have made some coils with 100 feet of copper tubing. I sandwich the coils between sheets of lexan. I've found the insulated leads from the antenna coil to the spark gap and ground plate needs to be solid copper wire. I started with solid 4 guage copper wire and now have solid 2-0 wire.
The electrosphere is actually the Ionosphere of the Earth and receives Bega Joules of energy in the form of ionizing radiation everyday from the sun. The sun never sets on at least half of the ionosphere each day.
The ionosphere collects a net positive charge. The Earth is always at a net negative charge. The photon charge carrier pairs flow from positive to negative, so, contrary to what some scientists say, lightning DOES ionize a path and flow from the cloud to the ground.
Anyway, it is possible to direct and control kilowatts of electrical energy with this set up. It does NOT require a battery or external power to a circuit to initiate transfer of energy. It does take a little while for the ionized path to the ionosphere to form once the tank circuit is tuned, but once this happens, a continuous flow of energy can be derived that is not dependent on the sun shining in your area.
This is not practical for those of you living in a city because of the size of the equipment and the flow of energy---probably a city would have an ordinance against erecting such an antenna.
Thought you'd all like to know about this.
Lawrence Rayburn
Imagine if you had a small device in the basement of your home, that could provide all of the energy your family required. What if this energy came at little or no cost to maintain? This would revolutionize the world today. There would be no more need to pay huge bills to energy companies each month. There would be no need for all of the wires that network the landscape, delivering electricity to each home. You could provide for yourself, without being dependent on somebody else for your comfort and survival. You would not have to work nearly as much or you would have extra income, which could raise your quality of life. There would be no more power outages due to failing equipment or downed lines. The idea is usually referred to as "free energy" and it has been a dream of many for a very long time. It has the potential to change our very lives.
But unfortunately, freeing people of their dependency on others for their energy needs, and lowering their cost of living dramatically, means big losses for electic and oil companies. They would virtually disappear. There would no longer be a need for any of them. But many believe that these big companies are not going to go quietly. Many people believe that a suppression of free energy technologies has been at work for nearly a century. Those who are profiting now, do not want you to become energy independent because that means the end of their profits. Most people probably don't believe we have the technology for free energy. Most people probably don't realize how close we have already been to actually having free energy. The majoity of these same people have likely never heard of Nikola Tesla.
Over a hundred years ago, the genius inventor known as Nikola Tesla, was constructing a tower that he believed could send free energy around the globe, without the need for wires. This tower became known as the Wardenclyffe Tower, and was a 187 foot tall tower with a fifty-five ton dome of conductive metals on top. Beneath it was an iron root system that went some 300 feet into the Earth. Once it was discovered that there was no way to put a meter on it and charge people for this energy, J.P. Morgan pulled his financing for the project. Morgan was a Big Oil man and the very nature of this project threatened his financial future. The project soon fell apart, as Tesla had already spent most of his money in the construction of the tower. The Tesla tower was never finished and was dismantled on July 4, 1917.
Many believe that Tesla's free energy technology would have worked and is still alive somewhere today. And this is understandable when you consider that most of his inventions worked when he said they would. After all, Tesla was known for giving demonstrations where he would hold a light bulb in his hand, and from acrossed the room, he would make it glow by simply holding it. He had figured out how to transfer energy without the need for wires and it was no secret. Tesla is most known today for giving us the Tesla Coil, but we also have him to thank for the discovery of wireless technologies that we use still today. Tesla also invented flourescent lighting, the Tesla induction motor, he developed the alternating current(AC) electrical system, and is now credited with the invention of modern radio. In 1893, he beat Thomas Edison in the "War of Currents" when he lit the World's Fair.
Tesla is not the only one who has pursued this idea of free energy for all. Thomas Henry Moray, in the 1930's, claimed that he was threatened, fired upon and had his lab wrecked on several occasions, in an attempt to end his free energy research. Stanely Meyer, best known for his "water fuel cell", made nine patents for his water powered car. He was later sued by two investors and ordered to pay back $25, 000 to the investors. His sudden death in 1998 led conspiracy theorists to believe that he had been poisoned to suppress the technology. Eugene Mallove, a proponent of cold fusion, made claims of suppression after he claimed that his team had successfully replicated the production of "greater-than-unity" output energy. In 2004, he was beaten to death in Connecticut. Gary McKinon is known for committing the biggest military computer hack, ever. He claims to have seen designs for zero-point energy devices, as well as other beneficial devices, that are suppressed from the public. In August of 2008, with less then a month to go, McKinnon had a successful appeal against extradition to the United States, after being diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. There are many others that have also worked towards the development of free energy technologies. Sooner or later, a technology is going to slip through the suppression and attract serious attention. Most of us would likely prefer sooner, rather than later.
Lawrence Rayburn claims to have successfully replicated Tesla's radiant energy technology, and to now be in process of creating a kit. Spurs firestorm of discussion. [A synopsis would be much appreciated!]
The Message That Started it All (this recent activity):
(before he actually reported success)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/message/5059
From: "[Lawrence] Rayburn" <srayburn@mo.quik.com>
Date: Sat Nov 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: Here is the FE, I need help to connect! Radiant Energy
There is a way to have your cake and eat it too!
Go back to Tesla's original experiments with tapping the electrosphere of the Earth with the radiant energy collector.
Tesla discovered a 'cold electricity' that he said had a spiral transmission wave to it.
In his patent, Tesla said he mounted a plate of steel or brass on a flag pole and placed a brass plate in the ground. In between the two, he placed a tuned tank circuit set to resonate near the standing wave frequency of the Earth. He parallelled the tunable tank circuit to a spark gap with carbon electrodes. The conductors he used would limit the amount of current he could pass and an air core transformer fed by the spark gap (pulsed DC) allowed him to derive pulsed AC or DC from the setup at whatever voltage he chose. Remember, the size of the conductors in the transformer and spark gap, and between the antenna and the spark gap determine the amount of current that can pass.
Updated to today, the antenna needs to be a flat spiral wound to resonate at the resonant frequency of the energy to be transferred from the electrosphere to the the ground through the spark gap. The tank circuit in parallel allows you to tune the circuit to pass current. The closer to the standing wave resonant frequency the tank circuit comes, the more current is passed to the spark gap and on to ground.
I am experimenting with flat spiral wound antennas made of copper tubing, 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 inch diameters so far, but may have to go as high as 2 inches in diameter. I started with 50 foot rolls of copper tubing, and have made some coils with 100 feet of copper tubing. I sandwich the coils between sheets of lexan. I've found the insulated leads from the antenna coil to the spark gap and ground plate needs to be solid copper wire. I started with solid 4 guage copper wire and now have solid 2-0 wire.
The electrosphere is actually the Ionosphere of the Earth and receives Bega Joules of energy in the form of ionizing radiation everyday from the sun. The sun never sets on at least half of the ionosphere each day.
The ionosphere collects a net positive charge. The Earth is always at a net negative charge. The photon charge carrier pairs flow from positive to negative, so, contrary to what some scientists say, lightning DOES ionize a path and flow from the cloud to the ground.
Anyway, it is possible to direct and control kilowatts of electrical energy with this set up. It does NOT require a battery or external power to a circuit to initiate transfer of energy. It does take a little while for the ionized path to the ionosphere to form once the tank circuit is tuned, but once this happens, a continuous flow of energy can be derived that is not dependent on the sun shining in your area.
This is not practical for those of you living in a city because of the size of the equipment and the flow of energy---probably a city would have an ordinance against erecting such an antenna.
Thought you'd all like to know about this.
Lawrence Rayburn
Imagine if you had a small device in the basement of your home, that could provide all of the energy your family required. What if this energy came at little or no cost to maintain? This would revolutionize the world today. There would be no more need to pay huge bills to energy companies each month. There would be no need for all of the wires that network the landscape, delivering electricity to each home. You could provide for yourself, without being dependent on somebody else for your comfort and survival. You would not have to work nearly as much or you would have extra income, which could raise your quality of life. There would be no more power outages due to failing equipment or downed lines. The idea is usually referred to as "free energy" and it has been a dream of many for a very long time. It has the potential to change our very lives.
But unfortunately, freeing people of their dependency on others for their energy needs, and lowering their cost of living dramatically, means big losses for electic and oil companies. They would virtually disappear. There would no longer be a need for any of them. But many believe that these big companies are not going to go quietly. Many people believe that a suppression of free energy technologies has been at work for nearly a century. Those who are profiting now, do not want you to become energy independent because that means the end of their profits. Most people probably don't believe we have the technology for free energy. Most people probably don't realize how close we have already been to actually having free energy. The majoity of these same people have likely never heard of Nikola Tesla.
Over a hundred years ago, the genius inventor known as Nikola Tesla, was constructing a tower that he believed could send free energy around the globe, without the need for wires. This tower became known as the Wardenclyffe Tower, and was a 187 foot tall tower with a fifty-five ton dome of conductive metals on top. Beneath it was an iron root system that went some 300 feet into the Earth. Once it was discovered that there was no way to put a meter on it and charge people for this energy, J.P. Morgan pulled his financing for the project. Morgan was a Big Oil man and the very nature of this project threatened his financial future. The project soon fell apart, as Tesla had already spent most of his money in the construction of the tower. The Tesla tower was never finished and was dismantled on July 4, 1917.
Many believe that Tesla's free energy technology would have worked and is still alive somewhere today. And this is understandable when you consider that most of his inventions worked when he said they would. After all, Tesla was known for giving demonstrations where he would hold a light bulb in his hand, and from acrossed the room, he would make it glow by simply holding it. He had figured out how to transfer energy without the need for wires and it was no secret. Tesla is most known today for giving us the Tesla Coil, but we also have him to thank for the discovery of wireless technologies that we use still today. Tesla also invented flourescent lighting, the Tesla induction motor, he developed the alternating current(AC) electrical system, and is now credited with the invention of modern radio. In 1893, he beat Thomas Edison in the "War of Currents" when he lit the World's Fair.
Tesla is not the only one who has pursued this idea of free energy for all. Thomas Henry Moray, in the 1930's, claimed that he was threatened, fired upon and had his lab wrecked on several occasions, in an attempt to end his free energy research. Stanely Meyer, best known for his "water fuel cell", made nine patents for his water powered car. He was later sued by two investors and ordered to pay back $25, 000 to the investors. His sudden death in 1998 led conspiracy theorists to believe that he had been poisoned to suppress the technology. Eugene Mallove, a proponent of cold fusion, made claims of suppression after he claimed that his team had successfully replicated the production of "greater-than-unity" output energy. In 2004, he was beaten to death in Connecticut. Gary McKinon is known for committing the biggest military computer hack, ever. He claims to have seen designs for zero-point energy devices, as well as other beneficial devices, that are suppressed from the public. In August of 2008, with less then a month to go, McKinnon had a successful appeal against extradition to the United States, after being diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. There are many others that have also worked towards the development of free energy technologies. Sooner or later, a technology is going to slip through the suppression and attract serious attention. Most of us would likely prefer sooner, rather than later.
Illuminati's Biggest
Crime? Suppressing Tesla Technology
June 6, 2010
Nikola Tesla, 1856-1943, the man who invented the "flying saucer"
by Christian Soderberg
(for henrymakow.com)
In 1911, Nikola Tesla revealed he was working on an anti gravity "flying machine".
"My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety, at higher speeds than have yet been reached, regardless of weather and oblivious of "holes in the air" or downward currents. It will ascend in such currents if desired. It can remain absolutely stationary in the air, even in a wind, for great length of time. Its lifting power will not depend upon any such delicate devices as the bird has to employ, but upon positive mechanical action." - Nikola Tesla in New York Herald Tribune, Oct. 15, 1911
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1911-10-15.htm
What happened to this anti-gravity craft of Tesla's?
When we understand that Tesla's "flying saucer" was powered by a so called "free energy system", a.k.a. 'over unity'-system (you get more energy out than you put in) at a time when the fledgling aviation and motor car industry was based on the oil and petroleum, it is quite easy to understand what happened to these inventions.
Extracting energy from the Aether, and the so called 'aether physics', is based on the cosmos being 'all filled with substance', which is in constant, perpetual motion.
Because there is no empty space in the cosmos, every time the "aether" gets disturbed, which is all the time, 'replacement' takes place, and so the whole cosmos is in constant motion, energized by the so called Zero Point Radiation (ZPR), the electromagnetic-radiation between all particles of the cosmos, which comes in various frequencies, effecting the different particles accordingly.
The same way the atoms of our bodies are in constant motion, oscillating, and being 'kept together and separate' by electromagnetism, so it is also with this 'all permeating medium', the aether, which transmits the ZPR to the atomic matter, so energizing it.
In "layman's terms"; the craft excludes itself from the gravity of planetary bodies with high frequency and high voltage electromagnetic radiation, and propels itself in the aether-medium with these HF-electromagnetic waves. Because the craft is excluded from the planetary gravity, the crafts are capable of fantastic acceleration and sharp turns in high speed without the crew inside the craft feeling any G-force effects.
Not only did the so called Illuminati (industrialist-banking cabal) steal this "aether physics"-technology, they also changed the "human knowledge of physics", replacing the knowledge of this aether-cosmos with Einstein's theories, now promoted everywhere.
..to name few benefiting from this theft.
- J P Morgan (banking, energy, railroads, US Steel)
- Edison & General Electric (oil &energy, railroads, aviation, war industrials, banking)
- Rockefellers (oil, banking, Nazi connections through IG Farben)
- Rothschilds (banking, oil & natural resources ..connections to Kuhn Loeb & company through Jacob Schiff )
- Ford motors (motors, war industrials)
- Brown Brothers Harriman & Co (banking, ship yards, railroads, IG Farben)
- Du Ponts (chemicals& war industrials, General Motors, IG Farben)
- Vanderbilts (railroads, ship yards)
- Boeing Company (aviation)
- Lockheed (aviation)
... Oil & energy, steel and other natural resources, railroads, ship yards, aviation, car industry, spare parts, logistics, banking & finance, war industrial complex ..are some of the reasons to steal and keep this technology hidden.
The official excuse behind this technology theft by this industrialist-banking cabal would be, of course; "In the interest of national security" .."if Al CIA-da got hold of these..".
Hiding this technology "for national security" has cost humanity trillions and trillions of dollars and wrecked the health of humanity and the planet.
For more information on Tesla's "flying saucer"-technology i suggest reading the books by William R. Lyne; Pentagon Aliens, Occult Ether Physics: Tesla's Hidden Space Propulsion System and the Conspiracy to Conceal It and Occult Science Dictatorship.
June 6, 2010
Nikola Tesla, 1856-1943, the man who invented the "flying saucer"
by Christian Soderberg
(for henrymakow.com)
In 1911, Nikola Tesla revealed he was working on an anti gravity "flying machine".
"My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety, at higher speeds than have yet been reached, regardless of weather and oblivious of "holes in the air" or downward currents. It will ascend in such currents if desired. It can remain absolutely stationary in the air, even in a wind, for great length of time. Its lifting power will not depend upon any such delicate devices as the bird has to employ, but upon positive mechanical action." - Nikola Tesla in New York Herald Tribune, Oct. 15, 1911
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1911-10-15.htm
What happened to this anti-gravity craft of Tesla's?
When we understand that Tesla's "flying saucer" was powered by a so called "free energy system", a.k.a. 'over unity'-system (you get more energy out than you put in) at a time when the fledgling aviation and motor car industry was based on the oil and petroleum, it is quite easy to understand what happened to these inventions.
Extracting energy from the Aether, and the so called 'aether physics', is based on the cosmos being 'all filled with substance', which is in constant, perpetual motion.
Because there is no empty space in the cosmos, every time the "aether" gets disturbed, which is all the time, 'replacement' takes place, and so the whole cosmos is in constant motion, energized by the so called Zero Point Radiation (ZPR), the electromagnetic-radiation between all particles of the cosmos, which comes in various frequencies, effecting the different particles accordingly.
The same way the atoms of our bodies are in constant motion, oscillating, and being 'kept together and separate' by electromagnetism, so it is also with this 'all permeating medium', the aether, which transmits the ZPR to the atomic matter, so energizing it.
In "layman's terms"; the craft excludes itself from the gravity of planetary bodies with high frequency and high voltage electromagnetic radiation, and propels itself in the aether-medium with these HF-electromagnetic waves. Because the craft is excluded from the planetary gravity, the crafts are capable of fantastic acceleration and sharp turns in high speed without the crew inside the craft feeling any G-force effects.
Not only did the so called Illuminati (industrialist-banking cabal) steal this "aether physics"-technology, they also changed the "human knowledge of physics", replacing the knowledge of this aether-cosmos with Einstein's theories, now promoted everywhere.
..to name few benefiting from this theft.
- J P Morgan (banking, energy, railroads, US Steel)
- Edison & General Electric (oil &energy, railroads, aviation, war industrials, banking)
- Rockefellers (oil, banking, Nazi connections through IG Farben)
- Rothschilds (banking, oil & natural resources ..connections to Kuhn Loeb & company through Jacob Schiff )
- Ford motors (motors, war industrials)
- Brown Brothers Harriman & Co (banking, ship yards, railroads, IG Farben)
- Du Ponts (chemicals& war industrials, General Motors, IG Farben)
- Vanderbilts (railroads, ship yards)
- Boeing Company (aviation)
- Lockheed (aviation)
... Oil & energy, steel and other natural resources, railroads, ship yards, aviation, car industry, spare parts, logistics, banking & finance, war industrial complex ..are some of the reasons to steal and keep this technology hidden.
The official excuse behind this technology theft by this industrialist-banking cabal would be, of course; "In the interest of national security" .."if Al CIA-da got hold of these..".
Hiding this technology "for national security" has cost humanity trillions and trillions of dollars and wrecked the health of humanity and the planet.
For more information on Tesla's "flying saucer"-technology i suggest reading the books by William R. Lyne; Pentagon Aliens, Occult Ether Physics: Tesla's Hidden Space Propulsion System and the Conspiracy to Conceal It and Occult Science Dictatorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment